A microscopic piece of heraldry necessarily stands condemned, because it merely pretends to hint that the owner thinks himself a person of distinction, instead of performing the true function of enabling the casual observer to identify the owner. Monograms and unostentatious heraldry are therefor the badge of the parvenu, and such heraldry is usually bogus. Genuine arms are almost always displayed boldly and beautifully at every possible opportunity, indoors and out. --
Thomas Innes of Learney, Scots Heraldry, pp. 161-162
I'm an Academic Herald. I'm not a "real" herald; I don't register people's coats of arms (though I can certainly suggest designs for those who might be interested). What I do is study, research, teach, and write about heraldry. And I like to share what I have learned about heraldry, hence this blog. I hope that you'll find it informative, interesting at least occasionally, and worth your time to come back. Got a question? Comments? Feel free to let me know. I'd love to hear from you. You can find my contact information in my Profile.
This is what happens when an heraldic artist has never seen anything more than a very rough description of an heraldic beast when painting ...
Genealogical Speakers Guild
Genealogical Speakers Guild
Monday, May 25, 2015
An Artist's Dilemma
It's a long-standing dilemma for heraldic artists: Do they put pictures of their work on the internet because doing so can help to drive sales of their works, or do they not post pictures of their work on the internet because others may download those images and use them without authorization or crediting the author of the work?
Many artists do indeed go ahead and post pictures of their work on-line, because it does assist them in making sales and earning a living from their art. But it is not uncommon that sometimes those images are found to appear on other websites or other places, without the authorization of the creator and very often with even crediting them.
A recent case in point is that of sculptor Patrick Damiaens, whose website showcasing his wonderful work is linked from this blog in the "Heraldic Artists' Websites" section down the left-hand column. (If you haven't visited his site yet, please do so. He's a very talented sculptor.) A picture of a unique carving that he had made for one of his clients and posted on his website appears to have been used as the model for the design on a candle being sold in a chain of stores in Europe. So you can decide for yourself whether or not his work was plagiarized, here's a photo comparing the design found on the candle to Mr. Damiaens' original carving:
As I said, it's a dilemma for artists of all sorts, not just heraldic artists. Do you post pictures of your work on the internet, knowing that it's probably the very best way to boost sales of your work, but also knowing that those pictures may be used by others in unauthorized ways and for which you may not even be given proper credit?