I like to see when people use heraldry in some way, no matter what the context is. Really, I do.
It's just that, far too often, what they use is sometimes, at best, only something that's almost like heraldry, but really isn't quite heraldry.
In this case, a newly-carved figurehead has been added to the replica caravel Matthew of Bristol, built in 1997 to mark the 500th anniversary of John Cabot's voyage of discovery to Newfoundlan. The addition of the new figurehead is to commemorate the anniversary of that first voyage.
However, despite being designed by, as the article notes, "an expert on heraldry," and said to be inspired by the arms of King Henry VII, the result is not quite heraldry.
All in all, I think the figurehead says less "Henry VII" that it does "Wales," but still, it's an attempt at heraldry, and as I said, I like to see when people use heraldry in some way even if, in my opinion, it comes up a little short of the goal.
You can find the May 1, 2015 story of this new figurehead on the website of The Bristol Post at http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Matthew-unveils-new-figurehead-mark-anniversary/story-26430448-detail/story.html and from BBC News at http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-32553359
I don't see a dragon, but I do see a royal crown. So maybe that's just a crowned Tudor rose? Still only pretty vaguely inspired by. :)
ReplyDeleteI don't see a dragon, but I do see a royal crown. So maybe that's just a crowned Tudor rose? Still only pretty vaguely inspired by. :)
ReplyDeleteIf it's a crown atop the Tudor rose, and not a dragon (and with the size of the image, it _is_ hard to tell for sure), then it's even more inappropriate, since the crowned Tudor rose remains a Royal badge to this day.
ReplyDeleteIt's a well known design, one of the Queen's beasts at Kew, the Greyhound of Richmond, and representative of the House of Tudor. Very definitely good heraldry.
ReplyDelete